You are in Ultrasone's Premier Sponsor Forum at Head-Fi.org.
To get back to Head-Fi.org's Main Forums, click here.
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Today's Posts Search
 

Go Back   Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio > Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums > Ultrasone Premier Sponsor Forum
 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-08-2009, 10:34 AM
Junior Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3
Default PRO 900?

Hi, I'm pretty new to headphones and planning to get my first Ultrasone, PRO 900 seems to be the best(within my budget), but I might not get to try it so here's my questions:
Would it be a waste if I'm not going to use it with an amp?
Am I better off getting a HFI-580 if that's how I'm going to use it?
Reason I say HFI-580 is I read that metal driver in more expensive models require long burn-in time, and I'm not sure how "good/bad" they sound new. Will the PRO 900 still be considerably better without burning in?

Last edited by mikej; 09-08-2009 at 10:42 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 02:24 AM
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: out of phase
Posts: 1,496
Default

The pro 900 sound pretty "okay" without an amp, nice amount of detail. But if you do KeeS' mod (and technically void the warranty) it sounds quite good indeed out of an mp3 player. As for long burn-in, yes pro 900 have insane insane burn-in time, but doing Kees mod makes everything forgiving (you know it's forgiving when you think the studio headphone sounds great out of an mp3 player lol).
__________________
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death. And we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:27 AM
Junior Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9
Default

I would agree that it sound 'okay' w/o amp, but for me it sounds too chaotic for...detailed but things seems all over the place. But if youre new to headphones I would say 'go' to 900 besides its long burn-in like all ultrasone products its awsome
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DAC and Amp Recommendation for DT770 Pro and Ultrasone Pro 900 trigg3rhappy Headphone Amps (full-size) 9 06-30-2009 01:56 AM
Hi what are the deferences between new version of pro 900 and old pro 900 Jian Ultrasone Premier Sponsor Forum 2 05-28-2009 06:08 PM
Daydreaming: HFI-780? PRO 900? PRO 750? KONAKONA Headphones (full-size) 46 04-24-2009 12:45 PM
Pro 750 and Pro 900 compare and contrast aamefford Ultrasone Premier Sponsor Forum 5 04-08-2009 02:44 AM
Ultrapaul: Please tell us about the new Pro 900 and how it compares to the Pro 750 and Edition 9. Peter Pinna Ultrasone Premier Sponsor Forum 3 08-29-2008 04:50 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 Head-Fi.org
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50 AM.