
09-06-2008, 12:20 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 821
|
|
2500 Pro vs 2200 HiFi
Been wanting to grab some cans that fold up neat so I can pack them away in a case for use in hotels etc.
I have been looking at the 2500's and was just about to buy when I spotted that the 2200 are some £30 cheaper from the same website, so I thought .. whats the difference between them soundwise etc, or will the 2200 be just as good a headphone as the 2500 give or take the colour!
__________________
Home : SqueezeCenter 7.3 -> Squeezebox3 -> Audio-Gd DAC-3SE -> Audiotailor Jade -> HD 650/Grado HF-2
Away : Ipod 160GB/Vaio Laptop -> LOD/USB -> IBasso D3 -> ER-6i/DT 770
|

09-06-2008, 03:00 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus: Moderator: Needs a regular fix of 'Fi. '06 National Meet Co-Coordinator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Elm City
Posts: 7,575
|
|
The 2200ULE is an open design, and uses a gold-plated driver.
The 2500 is also an open can, but uses a higher-resolution, titanium plated drive, and less forgiving of bad recordings & associated gear.
If using for travel, I'd suggest also looking at their closed counterparts - the PRO650 and the PRO750 respectively wrt the drivers.
|

09-06-2008, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Posts: 16,076
|
|
The PROline 2500 is the open back version of the 750. I have owned the 2500 for a while and really like its sound. However I should mention that not all enjoy its highs, those few indicate they are astrigent and harsh. I do not hear so but I thought I should mention.
BTW, I also use my 2500 as transportable and have enjoyed every second of their use in my office or while traveling. Since it comes w/ two cables you could shorten one and re-terminated it into a 1/8" so it is easier to use while traveling.
Good luck.
|

09-07-2008, 09:17 AM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 821
|
|
ok, so I assume no-one has the 2200, but lots have the 2500 and 750.
I was curious because on the website the 2200 retails for £20 more than the 2500 and 750, but in the sale it comes out to the £30 cheaper.
I have IEM and NC phones for travelling, but was after a set of cans to use whilst away from home, that can be packed away small and not get mashed whilse baggage handlers do there thing.
BT
__________________
Home : SqueezeCenter 7.3 -> Squeezebox3 -> Audio-Gd DAC-3SE -> Audiotailor Jade -> HD 650/Grado HF-2
Away : Ipod 160GB/Vaio Laptop -> LOD/USB -> IBasso D3 -> ER-6i/DT 770
|

09-07-2008, 01:41 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Posts: 16,076
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTony
ok, so I assume no-one has the 2200, but lots have the 2500 and 750.
I was curious because on the website the 2200 retails for £20 more than the 2500 and 750, but in the sale it comes out to the £30 cheaper.
I have IEM and NC phones for travelling, but was after a set of cans to use whilst away from home, that can be packed away small and not get mashed whilse baggage handlers do there thing.
BT
|
BT, in my experience the blue paint on the PROline 2500 is not very durable. I have seen many examples where the paint has flaked off and they have plenty of nicks and scratches. I am very careful w/ my gear and the headband on my PROline 2500 looks pretty beat up. It does not matter to me because IMO they sound awesome, but you should know the issue w/ the paint.
|

09-08-2008, 12:12 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Just NE of Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,235
|
|
The latest 2008 models have an improved headband, and also now come inside a hard-cover case that will withstand much abuse, and protects the cans quite well.
__________________
An ex-pro rock guitarist, so I know what live music REALLY sounds like!
|

09-09-2008, 11:03 AM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 275
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverrain
The latest 2008 models have an improved headband, and also now come inside a hard-cover case..
|
How about sonics of the 2008 model ? Any difference from the old models ? I mean the Pro 2500.
__________________
Sources & HeadAmp: OMZ D-2.5A V4.1 DAC/HEADAMP/PREAMP Remote & Manual Control
Sources: Metric Halo ULN-2, OMZ D-2.0A V4.1 DAC
Headphones: Sennheiser HD800 & HD445, JVC DX1000, Ultrasone Pro 2500, AKG K701s stock & recabled by Oritek Audio
Portable: iPod Nano G3, iPod Classic 120GB + Thunderbolt Amp
IEMs & Earphones: Westone UM3X & Sony MDR-E888
Interface: Lynx AES16e, M-Audio Firewire Solo & Audiophile USB
Sources owned: Rotel RCD-1072, Marantz SA-11S1, Revox B-225, Zhaolu D-2.0C/A
|

09-09-2008, 11:08 AM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Just NE of Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,235
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bordins
How about sonics of the 2008 model ? Any difference from the old models ? I mean the Pro 2500.
|
I only bought the 2008 model of PRO 750, 2500, and HFI-780.
There should be many peeps here that have older ones, and bought newer ones, that can answer that.
__________________
An ex-pro rock guitarist, so I know what live music REALLY sounds like!
|

09-09-2008, 05:04 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Littleton, Colorado USA
Posts: 2,818
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bordins
How about sonics of the 2008 model ? Any difference from the old models ? I mean the Pro 2500.
|
I was wondering the same thing. I swapped an AKG K271S a while ago for an Ultrasone HFI-2200ULE, but only listened to them briefly when I got them. About a week ago, I pulled them out and gave them a good listen and haven't listened to anything since then. They are very good headphones to my ears. They suffer a bit from lack of detail compared to my DT880 '03, but are much more fun to listen to. I tried the PL2500 a while ago and I think I got rid of them too soon...not enough burn-in as I bought them new. I'm thinking I should revisit them but didn't know whether to go for the older or newer ones.
|

09-09-2008, 05:54 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Just NE of Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,235
|
|
When I bought my Ultrasones recently, I was thinking about getting one of those leftover (on-sale) pre-2008 ones for less money, since I have read many times that they were sonically the same as the newer ones -- but, I read on the Ultrasone site that the 2008 models had improved headband, improved thicker earpads, and also a new hard-case, too -- all that combined made me just go for the newer 2008 models.
__________________
An ex-pro rock guitarist, so I know what live music REALLY sounds like!
|

09-20-2008, 07:01 AM
|
 |
1000+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,319
|
|
The drivers and technology are still the same, it just perhaps more durable, and the hard case is definately very attractive indeed.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM. |
|
|