Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
Can Jam '09
(2009
International
Head-Fi Meet)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos |

Can
Jam '09 graphic
courtesy of Edwood
Click on the links below
for Can Jam '09 photos,
impressions and reviews:
blubliss
1,
2,
3
dallan
1,
2,
3,
4
santacore
1,
2
nhat_thanh
1, 2
vpivinylspinner
1,
2,
3
amb
1
augustwest
1
eaglejo
1
johnsonad
1
shellylh
1
Jon L
1,
2,
3,
4
Germancub
1
zippy2001
1
IPodPJ
1
bhd812
1
Edwood
1,
2
abellaw
1,
2
minidiscs
1
atothex
1
HighLife
1
achristilaw
1
SiBurning
1,
2,
3,
4
SiBurning
5,
6,
7
LFF
1
Iron_Dreamer
1
doping panda
1
morphsci
1
ironbut
1
shaizada
1
jasper994
1,
2
jp11801
1
Uncle Erik
1
drubrew
1
(More impressions/photos
still being added.)
|
|
|
Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook |
|
|
Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
|
| Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors Discussion of portable headphones, earphones and in-ear monitors (IEMs). |

02-17-2009, 08:27 PM
|
 |
1000+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,367
|
|
Yuin PK1 VS PK3
I own the pk3 and am thinking of upgrading to pk1. I like the general sound of pk3 but overall quality doesn't match up to my D2000 and speakers. Does pk1 keep general sound signature of pk3 and improve upon it? pk3 is especially lacking in the mids department.
__________________
ESI Juli@ ~> Blue-Note Amp ~> Denon D2000 | Yuin PK3 | Swans M10 2.1
|

02-17-2009, 08:34 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 107
|
|
you could try some impedance adapters, some guy makes business out of it and claims pk3 sound fantastic. as i remember it is some 100ohm. google
|

02-17-2009, 08:52 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: over the mississippi moon
Posts: 498
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spike33
... pk3 is especially lacking in the mids department.
|
Hmmm... Very interesting. To me, I consider the PK3 to be quite strong in the mids, maybe too strong. Now, I don't have anything over $100 to which to compare their mids, so maybe you are speaking of a quality of mids that another phone has.
I know when I had the Shure SCL3 for a while, they were very strong and clean in the mids, but they were anemic in the bass and almost as weak in the highs.
__________________
Phones: Alessandro MS-1i (MS-100); HeadDirect RE0; KSC-75; Senn MX760;
Source: Zune 30GB -> E5; Sanza Fuse 4gb + 8gb mSDHC
Feedback: Here
|

02-18-2009, 02:23 AM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 839
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kmhaynes
Hmmm... Very interesting. To me, I consider the PK3 to be quite strong in the mids, maybe too strong. Now, I don't have anything over $100 to which to compare their mids, so maybe you are speaking of a quality of mids that another phone has.
I know when I had the Shure SCL3 for a while, they were very strong and clean in the mids, but they were anemic in the bass and almost as weak in the highs.
|
++ Where PK3s are really weak is highs quality and detail and bass quality and extension, but their mids are about the best I've heard from a headphone in that price range. Compared to PK3s, PK1s sound much better throughout the entire spectrum. The sound signature is quite similar with both, but PK1 does sound noticeably flatter (less colored, more realistic) than PK3. Also, PK1 has significantly deeper bass and MUCH better highs quality and extension. It also has more open sounding and much more detailed mids and much wider soundstage. Overall, I would say that PK1 is a more neutral, bigger sounding, more refined and detailed and better extended version of PK3 and definitely worth the price difference IMO.
__________________
Feedback
'Phones:
Current:, Yamaha YH-100 (coming!), Roland RH-300, Shure SRH840, Hifiman RE0, ATH-CM700, M-Audio Q40, Senn HD555, CX300, MX75, HD202, Yuin PK2, G2, UE Super.fi 3 Studio, AMP3 stock buds. Sony EX-085, JVC FX33
Past: Fostex T50RP, Westone ES3X, ATH-M50, German Maestro GMP 8.35 D, Senn HD25-1 II, Westone 3, Senn IE8, Senn HD380 Pro, Sleek SA6, M-Audio IE40 (rebranded Triple.fi), UE Super.fi 5 Pro, AKG K271 Studio and K26p, Senn HD25 1-II and PX100
Sources:
Current: Audigy 2 ZS + KXProject drivers --> Foobar 2000, AMP3, Sony NWZ-A816 4Gb, Samsung T9 2Gb and U2 2Gb, Sansa Clip 1 Gb, iPod Shuffle 1st gen 512Mb, iRiver T10 1Gb, a generic 1Gb MP4 player
Past: Samsung P2 2Gb, iRiver Clix 1st gen 2Gb, Creative Zen Stone
|

02-18-2009, 03:27 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,613
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianist
++ Where PK3s are really weak is highs quality and detail and bass quality and extension, but their mids are about the best I've heard from a headphone in that price range. Compared to PK3s, PK1s sound much better throughout the entire spectrum. The sound signature is quite similar with both, but PK1 does sound noticeably flatter (less colored, more realistic) than PK3. Also, PK1 has significantly deeper bass and MUCH better highs quality and extension. It also has more open sounding and much more detailed mids and much wider soundstage. Overall, I would say that PK1 is a more neutral, bigger sounding, more refined and detailed and better extended version of PK3 and definitely worth the price difference IMO.
|
Damn, now I want the PK1.
|

02-18-2009, 04:22 AM
|
|
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 216
|
|
PK1 vs PK2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianist
++ Where PK3s are really weak is highs quality and detail and bass quality and extension, but their mids are about the best I've heard from a headphone in that price range. Compared to PK3s, PK1s sound much better throughout the entire spectrum. The sound signature is quite similar with both, but PK1 does sound noticeably flatter (less colored, more realistic) than PK3. Also, PK1 has significantly deeper bass and MUCH better highs quality and extension. It also has more open sounding and much more detailed mids and much wider soundstage. Overall, I would say that PK1 is a more neutral, bigger sounding, more refined and detailed and better extended version of PK3 and definitely worth the price difference IMO.
|
Interesting comments about the PK1, but I see that you list the PK2 among your current phones.
How do the two compare?
Thanks,
__________________
Mobile
Klipsch X5, Ety 6i, Yuin PK2, Koss KSC-35
iPods -- Classic 160 and 4G photo 60 gig
Desktop
Thinkpad; Headroom Ultra Desktop Amp and Desktop Power Supply; Audioengine A2 speakers; Senn 600; Sangean WR-3 AM/FM-CDP
Home
Senn 650 (w Cardas cable); Headroom Max (w latest Max electronics); Bryston BP 25; Odyssey Stratos; Arcam FMJ 23; Vandersteen 3A; Hafler DH330 modded by John Hillig of Musical Design
|

02-18-2009, 06:02 AM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 443
|
|
Ahhh my next purchase! Hopefully my PFE's last me another year..
Pk1 vs PFE anyone?? haha
|

02-20-2009, 03:52 AM
|
|
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 591
|
|
I remember reading a while back that although the impedance adapters do "help" the PK3 catch up to the PK1s, they are using different drivers so they still sound different. :/
Don't know if that is right though, don't take my word on it.
__________________
Players: 1G Touch 4G Nano
LOD: Microshar iPod to Mini (For sale, pm me)/Lil' Knight 4 strand copper/gold LOD
Amp: iBasso T4
IEMs: UE Super Fi 5/PFE 112
|

02-20-2009, 07:13 PM
|
|
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 72
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spike33
I own the pk3 and am thinking of upgrading to pk1. I like the general sound of pk3 but overall quality doesn't match up to my D2000 and speakers. Does pk1 keep general sound signature of pk3 and improve upon it? pk3 is especially lacking in the mids department.
|
never had tried PK1.
But pk2 is way better than pk3.
If you go for pk1, put a decent amp into your shopping list.
|

02-20-2009, 07:17 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,865
|
|
PK2 way better than PK3? Not in my experience. Just different. I sold the PK2s but kept the PK3s, as I like the latter sound sig more. So it's not a fact that one is better, to me anyway.
__________________
IEM: UM3X, Klipsch S4. AL im616.
On-ear: Grado SR-80, Ksc75 (Kramered with PX200 pads), Ksc 35 (with cheap headband mod).
DAPs: Amp3 (Pro1 and Pro2), Zune80, Sony X-1061, Sony A818 (8GB), Sansa Clip+ (8GB)/Clip v2 (1GB).
Head-Fi FEEDBACK
|

02-20-2009, 07:20 PM
|
|
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 72
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tstarn06
PK2 way better than PK3? Not in my experience. Just different. I sold the PK2s but kept the PK3s, as I like the latter sound sig more. So it's not a fact that one is better, to me anyway.
|
I have used pk3 extensively before I had a chance to get pk2.
now PK2 is my favorite non-IEM. Detailed but not fatiguing, very balanced, soundstage is great.
|

02-20-2009, 07:23 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose/Orange, CA
Posts: 8,227
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tstarn06
PK2 way better than PK3? Not in my experience. Just different. I sold the PK2s but kept the PK3s, as I like the latter sound sig more. So it's not a fact that one is better, to me anyway.
|
Ditto (except it was my friend who bought the PK2 on my recommendation  ). I greatly prefer the PK3, because the percussion is noticeably airy on the PK2, and that never failed to throw me off.
__________________
Home: KECES-151 + Gilmore Lite + Shure SHR840
Home(2): KECES-151 + Little Dot I+ + Grado SR225
Portable: iPod Classic 160GB/Sansa Clip 2GB + Yuin PK3/Koss KSC75/Koss PortaPro/Shure SE530
College: Pico DAC + Gilmore Lite + SR225/SRH840
College(2): Pico DAC + Audioengine A2
Speakers: Marantz CC4001 + NAD C325BEE + Monitor Audio Silver RS6
There are those who treat music as a convenience,
and then there are those who recognize it as an art.
Feedback
|

02-20-2009, 07:56 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 839
|
|
Personally, I agree with those who think PK2 is not really better than PK3 - just different. PK2 does have more detail in the highs and tighter bass, but PK3s sound more fun IMO. PK2 sounds kinda unnatural to my ears - the trebles are too prominent and the lack of deep bass extension is really noticeable. For some reason, I never really felt that PK3 lacked bass extension as much, probably because PK3s had more mid bass and it and so lack of low bass doesn't seem as bad.
BTW, I also noticed that PK3s benefit from a fast, neutral/slightly bright amp with good detail, like MiniBox E+ for example. It makes PK3 more detailed in the treble and more controlled in the bass. PK2, on the other hand, doesn't benefit form an amp at all, and may even sound worse with some amps.
__________________
Feedback
'Phones:
Current:, Yamaha YH-100 (coming!), Roland RH-300, Shure SRH840, Hifiman RE0, ATH-CM700, M-Audio Q40, Senn HD555, CX300, MX75, HD202, Yuin PK2, G2, UE Super.fi 3 Studio, AMP3 stock buds. Sony EX-085, JVC FX33
Past: Fostex T50RP, Westone ES3X, ATH-M50, German Maestro GMP 8.35 D, Senn HD25-1 II, Westone 3, Senn IE8, Senn HD380 Pro, Sleek SA6, M-Audio IE40 (rebranded Triple.fi), UE Super.fi 5 Pro, AKG K271 Studio and K26p, Senn HD25 1-II and PX100
Sources:
Current: Audigy 2 ZS + KXProject drivers --> Foobar 2000, AMP3, Sony NWZ-A816 4Gb, Samsung T9 2Gb and U2 2Gb, Sansa Clip 1 Gb, iPod Shuffle 1st gen 512Mb, iRiver T10 1Gb, a generic 1Gb MP4 player
Past: Samsung P2 2Gb, iRiver Clix 1st gen 2Gb, Creative Zen Stone
|

02-20-2009, 08:55 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,865
|
|
Good point about amping the PK3s. They do improve nicely with an amp, as you note, and I happen to have a MinboxE+ so I know exactly what you mean.
__________________
IEM: UM3X, Klipsch S4. AL im616.
On-ear: Grado SR-80, Ksc75 (Kramered with PX200 pads), Ksc 35 (with cheap headband mod).
DAPs: Amp3 (Pro1 and Pro2), Zune80, Sony X-1061, Sony A818 (8GB), Sansa Clip+ (8GB)/Clip v2 (1GB).
Head-Fi FEEDBACK
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38 AM.
|