07-17-2009, 07:52 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 4,185
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaoDi
Those reviews get me wondering, when the website requests a sample of a product. Does the company not look over what the website has done in the previous past and how well they did their job *BEFORE* sending out a sample to them? Cause by the looks of it, they really don't...
|
re-read the fist one again "When Klipsch offered me the opportunity to try these, I initially told them I wasn’t interested because I find in-ear headphones very uncomfortable. My Klipsch contact person told me that these are different and I should try them. I relented. Why are they different? They use a patent pending oval ear tip. As it turns out, nearly everyone has oval-shaped ear canals."
it reads to me as though klipsch chased him do do thats wonderfully in depth review, the shockingly poor quality of all the reviews ive seen of these just makes it look like klipsch is worried about them getting favourable reviews.
__________________
Head-Fi Feedback
Current IEM's: Sennheiser CX 300, Creative EP-630, Shure SE210, Shure SE530, Shure E3, Shure SE110, Denon C751, Klipsch Custom 1, Klipsch Custom 2, Sony MDR-EX500LP, Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi 10 Pro, Sennheiser IE7, Klipsch Custom 3, Etymotic ER-4P, Sennheiser IE8, Radiopaq Pop, Philips SHE9850, Alpha Brainwavz, Beta Brainwavz, Westone UM3X, Soundmagic PL-50, Head Direct RE-0, Radiopaq Jazz, iMetal iM-590, Denon C710, Head Direct RE-252, MEElectronics M2, M6, M9, M11, R1, Westone UM2 and Radoipaq Classical
Headphones: C-Jays,V- Jays and Grado 325is
Amps: FiiO E3, FiiO E5, NuForce Icon Mobile and Practical Devices XM5
ebay Bi-flange tips Twitter
|