05-16-2009, 11:40 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 26
|
|
Look, I think you need to read my post again without getting all huffy. I mentioned that of course there was very different components that have varying power draw. I simply was saying that the listed "reason" doesn't really cover the statement and too much of a blanket statement and there are various ways that power usage can be affected. There are reasons why Rockbox tends to increase a device's battery life once fully ported to a device. To say things about "percent current" dedicated to "sound quality" further reinforces this.
Also, you haven't mentioned the SoC that is inside the device. Could you please let us know what it is based off of?
__________________
Team Rockbox
Sources: (plenty due to Rockbox development/testing) Toshiba Gigabeat F40, iriver H140, iriver H320, Archos Recorder v1 with 160 gig hard drive x3, iPod Nano 1st Gen, Sandisk Sansa e250, Sandisk Sansa c250, Sandisk Sansa Clip, Sandisk Sansa m200 (3 different hardware revisions), Archos AV340, Crappy Soundcard (TM)
Interconnects: Self-made including line out docks and the other usual ICs
Amps: RSA Hornet
Headphones: ue super.fi 5 pro, ue 11 pro
Next Purchase: Thinking...
|