View Single Post
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 08:43 AM
robojack's Avatar
robojack robojack is offline
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 899
Send a message via MSN to robojack
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigizzy75 View Post
dang, I was really hoping for true IEM wireless technology, Kinda sucks that we have to carry an antenna right next to our cerebellum. I know its progress but come on, we both know we where expecting to just insert some type of ear plug size wireless IEMs that would be stealthy and that no one would notice that we had background music inside our head. Besides I will admit, its alot better than having something like the bluetooth ear pieces that stick out our ear and look huge and tacky.


Anyways best of luck for all you wireless engineers,


Izzy
Speak for yourself. This is close to what I had pictured. Designed in one of two configurations: 1) Where the two drivers shared a common receiver, and 2) Where each driver had its own bulky receiver attached to the driver (similar to Senn's Kleer phone design).

For the sake of aesthetics, I'm pretty glad that they chose the shared receiver design. This way, there won't be one driver that's weaker than the other due to a less battery charge remaining. And since the Kleer receiver is located behind the head, at least from the front and certain angles, the drivers still look pretty slim-profile, instead of looking like you're wearing two mono-bluetooth headsets.
Reply With Quote