Quote:
Originally Posted by ADD
It's about time you did the planet a big favour and mention in your posts that everything you seem to state as fact is actually only your own opinion. It's pretty clear from the rediculous balony you've been posting over the years that you are pretty hard of hearing. You can't tell any difference between a CD copy of an LP and you can't hear the difference between lossy and uncompressed.
I don't object to your rediculous opinions - I just object to the fact that you state them as if they are fact and apply to all of mankind (more like deaf mankind).
There are obviously people around who can hear far, far FAR more than you can, so stop acting like you have the best ears in the galaxy, because I reckon my 68 year old mother would have it all over you in any listening test.
|
Don't start attacking people please. Aside from that I think you should at least reread bigshots post (or at least the sentence of which you quoted a part) before replying to it the way you did.
Bigshot is making a valid point. Nothing wrong with it at all.
I quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigshot
Once you raise the bitrate to a certain point the artifacts fall away, and there's no audible difference between compressed and lossless.
|
Try and explain to me why that would not be correct. Try it unless you want to start a lossless vs. lossless debate. In that case don't try to explain it please.