Originally Posted by gotchaforce
Thanks for the link. At least he posted something there, although the study clearly leaves a lot to be desired.
The purpose of my question is not so much to fan the flames of the science v. true believers debate. Rather, I am curious what VD--and its competitors--rely upon for the reasonable basis for their claims. Personally, I would not be confident using that linked study. Chef, perhaps you can provide some clarity around this issue.