Originally Posted by bigshot
Ken Rockwell has been posting tests on the D3 and D300 on his site, and although they're great, the D200 is still in the same ballpark. It has to get very dark and you have to blow up the image very big to see a difference. If you can afford a D300, go for it. But the difference between a D80 and either a D200 or D300 is much greater than the difference between a D200 and a D300.
See ya
Steve
First of all, images from D80 is very close (if not indistinguishable) to what D200 produces. And D40, although cheap, paired with decent lens, can produce images as good as its older brother D80.
If D200 is in the same ballpark as D300, and it's been said that D300's image quality is similar to D3, so all in all:
D3 = D40?
Sounds like reading What Hifi magazines
